Generative artificial intelligence is a hotly debated issue in the current landscape of educational research, with educators’ abilities to utilise this powerful tool falling by the wayside as institutions focus instead on regulation. Current research on generative AI in engineering education, whilst in its infancy, places a large onus on studying students and how they use such services. Therefore, little is currently known regarding current and proposed uses of generative AI by engineering educators and academics. Its potential in enhancing educational methodologies often remains underexplored amidst regulatory concerns. This is especially true for the field of diversity, equity and inclusion where generative AI has been used in numerous ways to cultivate more equitable outcomes for engineering students. Our ongoing research aims to elucidate these current and proposed uses of AI to understand how it can be used to create equitable learning environments for undergraduate engineering students. This research aligns with CDIO Standards by investigating how generative AI can support active learning environments (CDIO Standard 8) and integrate diverse learning preferences into the engineering curriculum (CDIO Standard 7). Through a reflexive thematic analysis of six semi-structured interviews with academics from Monash University's Faculty of Engineering, the main themes of Adaptive Integration, Balancing Efficiency with Deep Learning and Empowering Through Training and Resource Allocation were discovered. Future research should centre around uncovering the mechanisms of algorithmic bias in the field of engineering, assessing the efficacy of generative AI powered pedagogical interventions in achieving equity, diversity and inclusion as well as the development of faculty scaffolded ethical guidelines and frameworks for the use of generative AI tools.
Affiliations:
Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Keywords:
Equity
diversity
Inclusion
Artificial Intelligence
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
Year:
2024
Reference:
Abd-Elaal, E.-S., Gamage, S. H. P. W., & Mills, J. E. (2022). Assisting academics to identify computer generated writing. European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(5), 725–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2046709:
Adamopoulou, E., & Moussiades, L. (2020). An Overview of Chatbot Technology. IFIP International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations, 373–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49186-4_31:
Akgün, S., & Greenhow, C. (2022). Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education: Addressing Societal and Ethical Challenges in K-12 Settings. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference of the Learning Sciences - ICLS 2022, 1373–1376. https://doi.org/10.22318/icls2022.1373:
Bahroun, Z., Anane, C., Ahmed, V., & Zacca, A. (2023). Transforming Education: A Comprehensive Review of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Educational Settings through Bibliometric and Content Analysis. Sustainability, 15(12983). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712983:
Baillie, C., & Douglas, E. P. (2014). Confusions and Conventions: Qualitative Research in Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(1), 1–7. Materials Science & Engineering Collection; Social Science Premium Collection.:
Bernhard, J., & Baillie, C. (2013). Standards for Quality of Research in Engineering Education. Research in Engineering Education Symposium (REES 2013).:
Bobula, M. (2023). Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Higher Education: A Comprehensive Review of Opportunities, Challenges and Implications.:
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa:
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic Analysis. In APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004:
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. Sage Publications, Inc.:
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238:
Budhwar, P., Chowdhury, S., Wood, G., Aguinis, H., Bamber, G. J., Beltran, J. R., Boselie, P., Lee Cooke, F., Decker, S., DeNisi, A., Dey, P. K., Guest, D., Knoblich, A. J., Malik, A., Paauwe, J., Papagiannidis, S., Patel, C., Pereira, V., Ren, S., … Varma, A. (2023). Human resource management in the age of generative artificial intelligence: Perspectives and research directions on ChatGPT. Human Resource Management Journal, 33(3), 606–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12524:
Case, J. M., & Light, G. (2011). Emerging Research Methodologies in Engineering Education Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 186–210. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00008.x:
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.:
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. Routledge.:
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.:
Crutchley, M. (2021). Book Review: Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the New Jim Code. New Media & Society, 23(5), 1329–1332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444821989635:
Davis, S. C., Nolen, S. B., Cheon, N., Moise, E., & Hamilton, E. W. (2023). Engineering climate for marginalized groups: Connections to peer relations and engineering identity. Journal of Engineering Education, 112(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20515:
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.:
Fatahi, B., Khabbaz, H., Xue, J., & Hadgraft, R. (2023). Generative AI as a Catalyst for Enhanced Learning Experience in Engineering Education. 34th Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference.:
Garriott, P. O., Carrero Pinedo, A., Hunt, H. K., Navarro, R. L., Flores, L. Y., Desjarlais, C. D., Diaz, D., Brionez, J., Lee, B. H., Ayala, E., Martinez, L. D., Hu, X., Smith, M. K., Suh, H. N., & McGillen, G. G. (2023). How Latiné engineering students resist White male engineering culture: A multi-institution analysis of academic engagement. Journal of Engineering Education, 112(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20536:
Hess, J. L., Lin, A., Whitehead, A., & Katz, A. (2023). How do ethics and diversity, equity, and inclusion relate in engineering? A systematic review. Journal of Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20571:
Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10(3), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(86)90015-5:
Holstein, K., & Doroudi, S. (2021). Equity and artificial intelligence in Education: Will ‘AIEd’ amplify or alleviate inequities in Education? Cornell University. http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.12920:
Ismailov, M. (2022). Content lecturer and quality interaction in EMI university classrooms: A longitudinal case study. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2092120:
Johri, A. (2020). Artificial intelligence and engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 3, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20326:
Johri, A., Katz, A. S., Qadir, J., & Hingle, A. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence and engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 112(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20537:
Jonker, H., März, V., & Voogt, J. (2020). Curriculum flexibility in a blended curriculum. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), 68–84.:
Küskü, F., Özbilgin, M., & Özkale, L. (2007). Against the Tide: Gendered Prejudice and Disadvantage in Engineering. Gender, Work & Organization, 14(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2007.00335.x:
Lavrič, F., & Škraba, A. (2023). Brainstorming Will Never Be the Same Again—A Human Group Supported by Artificial Intelligence. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, 5(4), 1282–1301. https://doi.org/10.3390/make5040065:
Lohan, M., & Faulkner, W. (2004). Masculinities and Technologies: Some Introductory Remarks. Men and Masculinities, 6(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X03260956:
Longo, L. (2020). Empowering Qualitative Research Methods in Education with Artificial Intelligence. In A. P. Costa, L. P. Reis, & A. Moreira (Eds.), Computer Supported Qualitative Research (pp. 1–21). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31787-4_1:
Malmi, L., Adawi, T., Curmi, R., de Graaff, E., Duffy, G., Kautz, C., Kinnunen, P., & Williams, B. (2018). How authors did it – a methodological analysis of recent engineering education research papers in the European Journal of Engineering Education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(2), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1202905:
Menekse, M. (2023). Envisioning the future of learning and teaching engineering in the artificial intelligence era: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Engineering Education, 112(3), 578–582. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20539:
Mollick, E. R., & Mollick, L. (2023). Using AI to Implement Effective Teaching Strategies in Classrooms: Five Strategies, Including Prompts. The Wharton School Research Paper.:
Murugesan, S., & Cherukuri, A. K. (2023). The Rise of Generative Artificial Intelligence and Its Impact on Education: The Promises and Perils. Computer, 56(5), 116–121. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2023.3253292:
Necesal, P., & Pospisil, J. (2012). Experience with Teaching Mathematics for Engineers with the Aid of Wolfram Alpha. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2012 Vol I WCECS 2012, 1.:
Nikolic, S., Daniel, S., Haque, R., Belkina, M., Hassan, G. M., Grundy, S., Lyden, S., Neal, P., & Sandison, C. (2023). ChatGPT versus engineering education assessment: A multidisciplinary and multi-institutional benchmarking and analysis of this generative artificial intelligence tool to investigate assessment integrity. European Journal of Engineering Education, 48(4), 559–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2213169:
Nikolic, S., Suesse, T. F., Grundy, S., Haque, R., Lyden, S., Hassan, G. M., Daniel, S., Belkina, M., & Lal, S. (2023). Laboratory learning objectives: Ranking objectives across the cognitive, psychomotor and affective domains within engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2248042:
Pal, S. (2009). Enabling the Differently-Abled. Journal on Educational Psychology, 3(2), 13–26.:
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.:
Qadir, J. (2023). Engineering Education in the Era of ChatGPT: Promise and Pitfalls of Generative AI for Education. 2023 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON54358.2023.10125121:
Ragnedda, M., & Gladkova, A. (2020). Understanding Digital Inequalities in the Global South. In M. Ragnedda & A. Gladkova (Eds.), Digital Inequalities in the Global South (pp. 17–30). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32706-4_2:
Roscoe, R. D., & Chi, M. T. H. (2007). Understanding Tutor Learning: Knowledge-Building and Knowledge-Telling in Peer Tutors’ Explanations and Questions. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 534–574. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307309920:
Sun, L., Wei, M., Sun, Y., Suh, Y. J., Shen, L., & Yang, S. (2023). Smiling Women Pitching Down: Auditing Representational and Presentational Gender Biases in Image Generative AI. Preprint.:
Vander Linden, K. L., & Palmieri, P. A. (2023). Developing a Classic Grounded Theory Research Study Protocol: A Primer for Doctoral Students and Novice Researchers. Grounded Theory Review, 22(1), Article 1.:
Vinichenko, M. V., Melnichuk, A. V., & Karácsony, P. (2020). Technologies of improving the university efficiency by using artificial intelligence: Motivational aspect. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(4), 2696.:
Warschauer, M., Grant, D., Real, G. D., & Rousseau, M. (2004). Promoting academic literacy with technology: Successful laptop programs in K-12 schools. Incorporating Multimedia Capability in the Reporting of Applied Linguistics Research, 32(4), 525–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.09.010:
Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New Technology and Digital Worlds: Analyzing Evidence of Equity in Access, Use, and Outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179–225. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X09349791:
White, J., Fu, Q., Hays, S., Sandborn, M., Olea, C., Gilbert, H., Elnashar, A., Spencer-Smith, J., & Schmidt, D. (2023). A Prompt Pattern Catalog to Enhance Prompt Engineering with ChatGPT. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.11382:
White, J. W. (2011). Resistance to Classroom Participation: Minority Students, Academic Discourse, Cultural Conflicts, and Issues of Representation in Whole Class Discussions. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 10(4), 250–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2011.598128:
on June 26, 2024 - 13:02 Anonymous (not verified)
Conceive
Design
Implement
Operate
