CDIO as Curriculum Model for Education for Sustainable Development

S. CHEAH (2014). CDIO as Curriculum Model for Education for Sustainable Development. 13.

2014 10th International CDIO Conference, UPC BarcelonaTech, Spain

This paper shares the experience of the Diploma in Chemical Engineering of Singapore Polytechnic (SP) in transforming its chemical engineering education to develop a curriculum model for Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) that serves the dual-purpose of (1) satisfying industry requirements for graduates with the necessary technical knowledge and soft skills (CDIO skills), so that the students are competent in the workplace; and (2) allowing them to serve the broader needs of society, especially those at the bottom-of-the-pyramid. This represents our response to the SP-wide initiative of delivering holistic education to our students so that they are “competent, versatile, creative and innovative, imbued with sound values and excel in work and life so as to achieve the desired outcomes of being work-ready, life-ready and world-ready.”

We firstly review relevant literature on ESD, exploring the challenges faced by higher education in fulfilling its role in meeting the needs of sustainable development. We highlight the importance of Stephen Sterling’s work that distinguishes three types of relationship between education and sustainability: namely education about sustianability, education for sustainability, and education as sustainability. We then proceed to explain how we designed our model for ESD based on our previous CDIO implementation activity. References will be made to our papers presented at past CDIO conferences; these include introduction of chemical product design into the curriuclum; and integration of CDIO skills into core modules.

We emphasize certain unique features of our model which leads to the development of innovative chemical products, and provided some examples for illustration. In addition, our model integrates the use of design thinking and appropriate technology (a term attributed to E.F. Schumacher) – the former to complement the “Conceive” and “Design” stages, and the latter to support the “Implement” and “Operate” stages of chemical product engineering. We also outline how we “mapped” the three elements of designt thinking of user empathy, technical feasibility and business viability to the three pillars (social, environment, and economic) of sustainable development. We argue that this approach facilitates the design of a curriculum model using sustainable development as the basis for educating chemical engineering students, addressing both the cognitive and affective domains of learning, which better fulfils the desired graduate attributes of being work-ready, life-ready and world-ready.

Invariably a number of challenges were faced, especially in scaling-up the learning experience for all students, logistical difficulties, and lack of multi-disciplinarity in terms of student involvement. In summary, these are outlines as well as future proposals to further strengthen our effort in this important curriculum area.

Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference, Barcelona, Spain, June 15-19 2014

Authors (New):

Sin-Moh CHEAH

Pages:

Affiliations:

Singapore Polytechnic, Singapore

Keywords:

Sustainable development

Chemical Engineering

design thinking

CDIO Standard 3

CDIO Standard 7

Year:

2014

Reference:

AASHE (2010). Sustainability Curriculum in Higher Education: A Call to Action. Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education. :

Brown, T. (2009). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation, HarperBusiness. :

Burns, H. (2011). Teaching for Transformation: (Re)Designing Sustainability Courses based on Ecological Principles. Journal of Sustainability Education, Vol. 2. :

Byrne E.R., & Fitzpatrick J.J. (2009). Sustainability on Engineering Programmes: The Need for a Holistic Approach. North East American Society of Engineering Education Conference: Engineering in the New Global Economy. Newport, Connecticut, USA.:

Cheah, S.M., & Ng H.T. (2010). Product Design and Development for Chemical Engineering: Issues and Challenges. Proceedings of the 6th International CDIO Conference. Montréal, Canada. :

Cheah, S.M., Phua, S.T., & Ng, H.T. (2013). The Chemical Engineering CDIO Experience after 5 Years of Implementation. Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. :

Cheah, S.M. (2009). Integrating CDIO Skills in a Core Chemical Engineering Module: A Case Study. Proceedings of the 5th International CDIO Conference, Singapore. :

Cheah, S.M., Yang, K., & Sale, D. (2012). Pedagogical Approach to Integrate Sustainable Development into Engineering Curriculum. Proceedings of the 8th International CDIO Conference. Brisbane, Australia. :

Chua, P.H., & Cheah, S.M. (2013). Education for Sustainable Development using Design Thinking and Appropriate Technology. Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA :

Cussler, E.L., & Moggridge, G.D. (2001). Chemical Product Design, Cambridge University Press. :

Czippan, K., Varga, A., & Benedict, F. (2010). Collaboration and Education for Sustainable Development. Partnership and Participation for a Sustainable Tomorrow, European Commission. :

De Rebello, D. (2003). What is the Role for Higher Education Institutions in the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development? Report on the International Conference on Education for a Sustainable Future. Prague, Czech Republic. :

Dos Santos Martin, R.H. (2010). Sustainable Development Requires an Integrating Discipline to Address its Unique Problems – Design Thinking. J. for a Global Sustainable Info Soc, 8(1). :

Elliott, J. (2010). Insights to Transformative Learning through Education for Sustainable Development. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 5, 96-113. :

Hazeltine, B. & Bull, C. (1999). Appropriate Technology: Tools, Choices and Implications., San Diego: Academic Press. :

Herrmann, M. (2007). The Practice of Sustainable Education through a Participatory and Holistic Teaching Approach. Communication, Cooperation and Participation-online, 1, 72-87. :

Kagawa, F., (2007). Dissonance in Students’ Perceptions of Sustainable Development and Sustainability: Implications for Curriculum Change. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., 8, 317-338. :

Nagel, R.L., Papas, E.C., & Pierrakos, O. (2012). On a Vision to Educating Students in Sustainability and Design – The James Madison University School of Engineering Approach, Sustainability, 4, 72- 91. :

Ng, H.T., & Cheah, S.M. (2012). Chemical Product Engineering using CDIO Enhanced with Design Thinking. Proceedings of the 8th International CDIO Conference. Brisbane, Australia. O’Rafferty, S. (2011). Interdisciplinarity, Design Thinking and Sustainable Development: Strategies for UK Higher Education, The Higher Education Academy, UK. :

Puukka, J. (2008). Mobilising Higher Education for Sustainable Development – Lessons Learnt from the OECD Study, Proceedings of the 4th International Barcelona Conference on Higher Education, GUNI. :

Rittel, H.W.J., & Webber, M.M. (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, Vol.4, 155-169. :

Robinson, K. (2011). Out of Our Minds: Learning to be Creative, Capstone Publishing Ltd, UK :

Sandekian, R., Amadei, B., Bielefeldt, A., & Summers, R.S. (2007). Engineering for Poverty Reduction: Challenges and Opportunities. 5th Latin American and Caribbean Conference for Engineering and Technology, Tampico, Mexico. :

Schumacher E.F. (1973). Small is Beautiful: Economics as if People Mattered. Blond & Briggs Ltd, London. :

Scott, W. (2002). Sustainability and Learning: What Role for the Curriculum?, Inaugural Lecture, Council for Environmental Education, Centre for Research in Education and the Environment, University of Bath. :

Segalas, J., Ferrer-Balas, D., & Muller, K.F. (2010). What Do Engineering Students Learn in Sustainability Courses? The Effect of the Pedagogical Approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 275-284. :

Shaeiwitz, J.A., & Turton, R. (2003). Educating Chemical Engineers in Product Design, Int. J. Engng Ed, 19(1), 153-157. :

Shephard, K. (2008). Higher Education for Sustainability: Seeking Affective Learning Outcomes, Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., 9(1), 87-98. :

Sibbel, A. (2009). Pathways towards Sustainability through Higher Education. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., 10(1), 68-82. :

Sipos, Y., Battisti, B., & Grimm, K. (2008). Achieving Transformative Sustainability Learning: Engaging Head, Hands and Heart. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., 9(1), 68-86.:

Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable Education – Re-visioning Learning and Change, Schumacher Briefings, Green Books, Dartington, UK. :

Sterling, S. (2004). Higher Education, Sustainability, and the Role of Systemic Learning. Higher Education and the Challenge of Sustainability: Problematics, Promise and Practice, Corcoran, P.B. and Wals, A.E.J. (Eds.), Kluwer: Dordrecht, 47-70. :

Svanstrom, M., Lozano-Garcia, F.J., & Rowe, D. (2008). Learning Outcomes for Sustainable Development in Higher Education. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., 9(3), 339-351. :

Tharakan, J. (2006). Educating Engineers in Appropriate Technology for Development. 9th UICEE Annual Conference on Engineering Education, Muscat, Oman.:

UNESCO (1997). Educating for a Sustainable Future: A Trans-disciplinary Vision for Concerted Action. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.:

UNESCO (2002). Education for Sustainability - From Rio to Johannesburg: Lessons Learnt from a Decade of Commitment. Report for World Summit on Sustainable Development; Johannesburg, South Africa. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. :

UNESCO (2008). Reinventing Higher Education: Toward Participatory and Sustainable Development. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. :

Vare, P., & Scott, W. (2007). Learning for a Change: Exploring the Relationship between Education and Sustainable Development. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 1:2, 191-198. :

Vucetich, J.A., & Nelson, M.P. (2010). Sustainability: Virtuous or Vulgar?, BioScience, 60(7), 539-544. :

Waas, T., Hugé, J., Ceulemans, K., Lambrechts, W., Vandenabeele, J., Lozano, R., & Wright, T. (2012). Sustainable Higher Education: Understanding and Moving Forward. Flemish Government – Environment, Nature and Energy Department, Brussels. :

Wahl, D.C., & Baxter, S. (2008). The Designer’s Role in Facilitating Sustainable Solutions. Design Issues, 24(2), 72-83. :

Wals, A.E.J. & Jickling, B. (2002). Sustainability in Higher Education: From Doublethink and Newspeak to Critical Thinking and Meaningful Learning. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., 3(3), 221-232:

Yau, J., Cheah, S.M., & Phua, S.T. (2013). Contextualizing the Teaching of Ethics in Chemical Engineering Curriculum. Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. :

Young, G. (n.a.). Design Thinking and Sustainability, Available at http://zum.io/wpcontent/uploads/2010/06/Design-thinking-and-sustainability.pdf; accessed June 12, 2012 :

Yuen, A.W.P. & Cheah, S.M. (2012). Using CDIO to Design a Learning Experience in Hypothesis Testing. Proceedings of the 8th International CDIO Conference; Brisbane, Australia. :

on July 4, 2014 - 10:00 MAndersson

CDIO as Curriculum Model for Education for Sustainable Development

Navigation

CDIO as Curriculum Model for Education for Sustainable Development

Share this content.