Peer Learning With Small Means: A Case Study Of Implementing Peer Learning In A Laboratory Exercise

Peer Learning With Small Means: A Case Study Of Implementing Peer Learning In A Laboratory Exercise

J. Hansson, P. Kolmskog, Y. Odemark, A. Högfeldt (2011).  Peer Learning With Small Means: A Case Study Of Implementing Peer Learning In A Laboratory Exercise. 10.

Peer learning in teaching is a common method which makes students share their problems and learn from each other. It is often used to increase students´ understanding and level of deep learning. In this study, the peer learning concept has been applied to a laboratory exercise and a comparative study has been performed. The study consists of two cases, a reference group, which performed the exercise in a traditional way, and a peer learning group, which performed the exercise in a modified way. In the peer learning group, the students were encouraged to ask each other for help and an additional presentation was added in order to further increase the interaction between students. The outcome was evaluated through classroom observations, a questionnaire, and a short knowledge test. The results show that the peer learning approach had different positive effects. When the students were instructed to ask each other for help, there was an apparent change in the students´ behaviour. The students in the peer learning group were more active and more creative compared to the reference group. They also had better results on the knowledge test and were more satisfied with the exercise. This demonstrates that small changes to an existing laboratory exercise can increase the understanding, involvement and creativity of the students. In this case, this was also achieved without an extended workload on the teacher.

Authors (New): 
Jonas Hansson
Peter Kolmskog
Ylva Odemark
Anna-Karin Högfeldt
Pages: 
10
Affiliations: 
KTH Royal Institute of Technology,Sweden
Keywords: 
Peer learning
laboratory exercise
case study
increased learning
cooperation
Year: 
2011
Reference: 
Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning (2006/962/EC). Official Journal of the European Union. 30.12.2006 pp 10-17. : 
Boud D., Cohen R., Sampson J., "Peer Learning and Assessment", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 24, 1999, pp 413-426. : 
Topping K.J., "Trends in Peer Learning", Educational Psychology, Vol. 25, 2005, pp 631-645. : 
Vygotsky L.S., Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Harvard University Press, 1978. : 
Säljö R., Lärande i praktiken: ett sociokulturellt perspektiv (Learning in practise: a socioculture perspective), Prisma, 2000. : 
Wood D., Bruner J., Ross G., “The role of tutoring in problem solving”, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Vol. 17, 1976, pp 89-100. : 
Borglund D., "A case study of peer learning in higher aeronautical education", European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 32, 2007, pp 35-42.: 
Buchs C., Butera F., Mugny G., “Resource interdependence, student interactions and performance in cooperative learning”, Educational Psychology, Vol. 24, 2004, pp 291-314.: 
Magin D.J., "Collaborative Peer Learning in the Laboratory", Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 7, 1982, pp 105-117. : 
Biggs J., Tang C., Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does, Open University Press, 2007. : 
Bain K., What the best college teachers do, Harvard University Press, 2004: 
Crouch C.H. and Mazur E., "Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results", American Journal of Physics, Vol. 69, 2001, pp 970-977. : 
Go to top
randomness