TRAINING FUTURE SKILLS - SUSTAINABILITY, INTERCULTURALITY & INNOVATION IN A DIGITAL DESIGN THINKING FORMAT

TRAINING FUTURE SKILLS - SUSTAINABILITY, INTERCULTURALITY & INNOVATION IN A DIGITAL DESIGN THINKING FORMAT

L. Steuer-Dankert (2023).  TRAINING FUTURE SKILLS - SUSTAINABILITY, INTERCULTURALITY & INNOVATION IN A DIGITAL DESIGN THINKING FORMAT. 119-130.

The complex questions of today for a world of tomorrow are characterized by their global impact. Solutions must therefore not only be sustainable in the sense of the three pillars of sustainability (economic, environmental, and social) but must also function globally. This goes hand in hand with the need for intercultural acceptance of developed services and products. To achieve this, engineers, as the problem solvers of the future, must be able to work in intercultural teams on appropriate solutions, and be sensitive to intercultural perspectives. To equip the engineers of the future with the so-called future skills, teaching concepts are needed in which students can acquire these methods and competencies in application-oriented formats. The presented course "Applying Design Thinking - Sustainability, Innovation and Interculturality" was developed to teach future skills from the competency areas Digital Key Competencies, Classical Competencies and Transformative Competencies. The CDIO Standard 3.0, in particular the standards 5, 6, 7 and 8, was used as a guideline. The course aims to prepare engineering students from different disciplines and cultures for their future work in an international environment by combining a digital teaching format with an interdisciplinary, transdisciplinary and intercultural setting for solving sustainability challenges. The innovative moment lies in the digital application of design thinking and the inclusion of intercultural as well as trans- and interdisciplinary perspectives in innovation development processes. In this paper, the concept of the course will be presented in detail and the particularities of a digital implementation of design thinking will be addressed. Subsequently, the potentials and challenges will be reflected and practical advice for integrating design thinking in engineering education will be given.

Authors (New): 
Linda Steuer-Dankert
Pages: 
119-130
Affiliations: 
FH Aachen University of Applied Sciences
Keywords: 
design thinking
Sustainability
Future Skills
Interculturality
Interdisciplinarity
Transdisciplinarity
CDIO Standard 5
CDIO Standard 6
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
Year: 
2023
Reference: 
Albrecht, A. (2020). Arbeitswelt 4.0. In: L. von Rosenstiel, E. Regnet, M. Domsch (Eds.): Führung von Mitarbeitern: Handbuch für erfolgreiches Personalmanagement. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel, pp. 733- 746.: 
Alswad, A. & Junaid, S. (2022). Debate as a Tool in Engineering and Sustainability Education. Proceedings of the 18th International CDIO Conference (pp. 979-990). Reykjavik, Iceland: Reykjavik University. 13-15, 2022.: 
Bartz, D. E., Hillmann, L. W., Lehrer, S. & Mayhugh, G. M., 1990, ’A Model for Managing Workforce Diversity’, Management Education and Development 21(5), pp. 321-326.: 
Brent, A. C. & Labuschagne, C. (2004). Sustainable life cycle management: indicators to assess the sustainability of engineering projects and technologies. Proceedings of the IEEE International Engineering Management Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37574) (pp. 99-103) Vol.1, doi: 10.1109/IEMC.2004.1407084.: 
Burke, S. & Gaughran, W. F. (2007). Developing a framework for sustainability management in engineering SMEs. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 23 (6), pp. 696-703.: 
CDIO (n.d.). CDIO Standards 3.0. (2022, December 29). Retrieved from: http://www.cdio.org/content/cdio-standards-30.: 
Corsten, H. & Roth, S. (Hrsg.) (2012). Unternehmerisches Handeln in globaler Verantwortung. Springer Gabler: Wiesbaden.: 
Crawley, E. F., Malmquist, J., Ostlund, S. & Brodeur, D. R. (2007). Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach. Springer, New York: 
Dedeurwaerdere, T. (2013). Sustainability Science for Strong Sustainability. Université catolique de Louvain. (2022, December 30). Retrieved from: https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/29496.: 
Eggers, B., Hollmann, S. (2018). Digital Leadership – Anforderungen, Aufgaben und Skills von Führungskräften in der „Arbeitswelt 4.0“. In: Keuper, F., Schomann, M., Sikora, L., Wassef, R. (Eds.): Disruption und Transformation Management. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19131-3_3.: 
Fajen A (2017). Erfolgreiche Führung multikultureller virtueller Teams. Wie Führungskräfte neuartige Herausforderungen meistern. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden.: 
Fenner, R., & Morgan, D. (2021). The Barcelona Declaration revisited: core themes and new challenges.10th Engineering Education for Sustainable Development Conference (EESD2021), pp.33- 43.: 
Fitzpatrick, J. J. (2017). Does engineering education need to engage more with the economic and social aspects of sustainability? European Journal of Engineering Education, 42 (6), pp. 916-926.: 
Foley, M., Foley, J. T. & Kays, M. (2022). Emracing Failure as an Integral Aspect of Engineering Education. Proceedings of the 18th International CDIO Conference (pp. 1009-1020). Reykjavik, Iceland: Reykjavik University. June 13-15, 2022.: 
Gardenswartz, L., Rowe, A. (2003). Diverse Teams at Work. Capitalizing on the Power of Diversity. Alexandria, VA: Society for Human ResourceManagement.: 
Gillwald, K. (2000). Konzepte sozialer Innovation. WZB Discussion Paper, No. P 00-519, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin.: 
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.: 
House, R. J., P. J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. W. Dorfman & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, Leadership, and Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.: 
Konar, M, Evans, T P., Levy, M., Schott, C. A., Troy, T. J., Vörösmarty, C. J. & Sivapalanm M. (2016). Water resources sustainability in a globalizing world: who uses the water? HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 30, p.3330-3336.: 
Leicht-Scholten, C.; Steuer-Dankert, L. (2019). Educating Engineers for Socially Responsible Solutions Through Design Thinking. In: Gavin Melles (Ed.): Design thinking in higher education: interdisciplinary encounters. Springer Verlag, Singapore, p.229-246. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-5780- 4_11: 
Loden, M., Rosener, J. B. (1991). Workforce America! Managing Employee Diversity as a Vital Resource. New York City, NY: McGraw-Hill.: 
Lorenzo, R., Voigt, N., Schetelig, K., Zawadzki, A., Welpe, I. & Brosi, P. (2017) The Mix That Matters. Innovation through Diversity. (2023, January 2). Retrieved from: http://mediapublications. bcg.com/22feb2017-mix-that-matters.pdf.: 
Lupi, F., Mabkhot, M.M., Finžgar, M., Minetola, P., Stadnicka, D., Maffei, A., Litwin, P., Boffa, E., Ferreira, P., Podržaj, P, Chelli, R., Lohse, N. & Lanzetta, M. (2022). Toward a Sustainable Educational Engineer Archetype through Industry 4.0. Computers in Industry, 134, 103543, doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2021.103543.: 
Magnell, M., Delin, C., Rosén, A., Jerbrant, A., Tibert, G. & Casanueva Perez, C. (2022). Integrating Gender Equality, Diversity, and equal Conditions, in Engineering Education. Proceedings of the 18th International CDIO Conference (pp. 979-990). Reykjavik, Iceland: Reykjavik University. June 13-15, 2022.: 
Malmqvist, J., Edström, K., & Rosén, A. (2020a). CDIO Standards 3.0 – Updates to the Core CDIO Standards. Proceedings of the 16th International CDIO Conference (pp. 60-76), hosted on-line by Chalmers University of Technology. Sweden: Gothenburg. June 8-10, 2020.: 
Malmqvist, J., Edström, K., Rosén, A., Hugo, R., & Campbell, D. (2020b). Optional CDIO Standards: Sustainable Development, Simulation-Based Mathematics, Engineering Entrepreneurship, Internationalisation & Mobility. Proceedings of the 16th International CDIO Conference (pp. 48-59), hosted on-line by Chalmers University of Technology. Sweden: Gothenburg. June 8-10, 2020.: 
Malmqvist, J., Lundqvist, U., Rosén, A., Edström, K., Gupta, R., Leong, H., Cheah, S. M., Bennedsen, J., Hugo, R., Kamp, A., Leifler, O., Gunnarsson, S., Roslöf, J., & Spooner, D. (2022). The CDIO Syllabus 3.0. An Updated Statement of Goals. Proceedings of the 18th International CDIO Conference (pp. 18-36). Reykjavik, Iceland: Reykjavik University. June 13-15, 2022.: 
Mertens, A., Brauner, P., Baier, R., Brillowski, F., Dammers, H., Van Dyck, M., Kong, I., Königs, P., Kordtomeikel, F., Liehner, G. L., Pütz, S., Rodemann, N., Schaar, A. K., Steuer-Dankert, L., Vervier, L., Wlecke, S., Gries, T., Leicht-Scholten, C., Nagel, S. K., Piller, F. T., Schuh, G., Ziefle, M. & Nitsch, V., (2022). Modelling Human Factors in Cyber Physical Production Systems by the Integration of Human Digital Shadows. In: Michael, J. & Wortmann, A. (Eds.): Modellierung 2022 Satellite Events. Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V., pp. 147-149. https://doi.org/10.18420/modellierung2022ws-018.: 
Morandín-Ahuerma, Indra, Armando Contreras-Hernández, Dante Ariel Ayala-Ortiz, and Octavio Pérez-Maqueo (2019). Socio–Ecosystemic Sustainability, Sustainability 11, no. 12: 3354. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123354.: 
Mulgan, G. (2006). The Process of Social Innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, MIT Press, vol. 1(2), pp. 145-162.: 
Nooteboom, B., Van Haverbeke, W., Duysters, G., Gilsing, V. A. & Van den Oord, A. (2007) Optimal Cognitive Distance and Absorptive Capacity, Research Policy, 36(7), pp. 1016-1034.: 
Pelenc, J. (2015). Weak Sustainability vs. Strong Sustainability. Brief for GDSR. (2022, December 30). Retrieved from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/6569122-Pelenc- Weak%20Sustainability%20versus%20Strong%20Sustainability.pdf.: 
Pelled, L. H. (1996). Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work Group Outcomes: An Intervening Process Theory. Organization Science, 7, pp. 615-631.: 
Petry, T. (Ed.) (2019). Digital Leadership. 2. Auflage. Haufe-Lexware, Freiburg.: 
Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2011). Design Thinking – Understand – Improve – Apply. Heidelberg: Springer.: 
Regnet, E. (2020). Der Weg in die Zukunft - Anforderungen an die Führungskraft. In: L. von Rosenstiel. In: E. Regnet, M. Domsch (Eds.): Führung von Mitarbeitern: Handbuch für erfolgreiches Personalmanagement. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel, pp. 55-76.: 
Rosén, A., Hermansson, H., Finnveden, G., & Edström, K. (2021). Experiences from Applying the CDIO Standard for Sustainable Development in Institution-Wide Program Evaluations. Proceedings of the 17th International CDIO Conference. Bangkok, Thailand: Chulalongkorn University & Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi. June 21-23, 2021.: 
Sánchez-Carracedo, F., Moreno-Pino, F. M., Sureda, B., Antúnez, M. & Gutiérrez, I. (2019). A Methodology to Analyze the Presence of Sustainability in Engineering Curricula. Case of Study: Ten Spanish Engineering Degree Curricula. Sustainability 11 (17): 4553. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174553.: 
Soleimani, S. M., Mughrabi, A., AlFar, M. & Jaeger, M. (2022). Development of Student Sustainability Awareness, Attitudes and Actions. Proceedings of the 17th International CDIO Conference. Bangkok, Thailand: Chulalongkorn University & Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi. June 21-23, 2021.: 
Steuer-Dankert, L., Gilmartin, S. K., Muller, C. B., Dungs, C., Sheppard, S. & Leicht-Scholten, C. (2019). Expanding Engineering Limits: A Concept for Socially Responsible Education of Engineers. International Journal of Engineering Education, 35 (2), p. 658-673. https://www.ijee.ie/contents/c350219.html.: 
Steuer-Dankert, L. & Leicht-Scholten, C. (2016). Social responsibility and innovation - key competencies for engineers. Proceedings of the International Technology, Education and Development Conference (pp. 1-8). Seville, Spain. November, 2016.: 
Stifterverband & McKinsey (2021). Future Skills. (2022, December 29). Retrieved from: https://www.stifterverband.org/medien/future-skills-2021: 
Teichmann, S., Hüning, C. (2018). Digital Leadership – Führung neu gedacht: Was bleibt, was geht?. In: Keuper, F., Schomann, M., Sikora, L., Wassef, R. (Eds.): Disruption und Transformation Management. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19131-3_2.: 
Thürer, M., Tomašević, I., Stevenson, M., Qu, T. & Huisingh, D. (2018). A systematic review of the literature on integrating sustainability into engineering curricula. Journal of Cleaner Production, 181, pp. 608-617.: 
Trompenaars, F. & Hampden-Turner, C. (2012). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding diversity in global business. Nicholas Brealey International; 3rd edition, Boston.: 
Umweltbundesamt (2022). Indikator: Umweltfreundlicher Konsum. (2023, January 2). Retrieved from: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/daten/umweltindikatoren/indikator-umweltfreundlicher-konsum#diewichtigsten- fakten.: 
UNESCO (2021). Declaration on the Responsibilities of the Present Generations towards Future Generations. (2022, December 29). Retrieved from: https://en.unesco.org/about-us/legalaffairs/ declaration-responsibilities-present-generations-towards-future-generations.: 
United Nations (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development - Our Common Future. (2023, January 2). Retrieved from: https://www.are.admin.ch/are/de/home/medienund- publikationen/publikationen/nachhaltige-entwicklung/brundtland-report.html.: 
United Nations (n.d.). The 17 Goals. (2022, December 28). Retrieved from: https://sdgs.un.org/goals.: 
Go to top
randomness