The present version of Curriculum Agility is described by 10 principles and is progressing to become a future CDIO Standard. The proposed standard, Curriculum Agility, is designed to be responsive to both future and current industrial requirements with the aim of ensuring that the curriculum contributes to developing so called "industry-ready graduates", i.e., engineering graduates that are competent, capable and confident with respect to technical and employability skills. This paper complements the ongoing work in the CDIO community in creating the optional Curriculum Agility standard. At a workshop on industrial engagement in curriculum agility arranged at the 19th International CDIO Conference in Trondheim, Norway, the participating delegates highlighted both challenges and opportunities. Comments on challenges included, "Are their [industry] perspectives too short? In line with societal needs?" and "[Challenge] the industry to advocate for the future because sustainability is an obligation for us." Comments on opportunities included "[opportunity] bringing in industry, reverence, and authenticity" and "[opportunity for] alumni to provide feedback on courses... on new courses, potential [student] projects... possible research projects." The paper will discuss possibilities for a framework to aid curriculum agility development and enable academic practitioners to effectively engage with industrial partners, recognizing that any learning outcomes of a curriculum need to be constructively aligned with industry's current and future requirements. The curriculum also needs to meet other competing stakeholder requirements, such as those from students, institutions, governments, and relevant Professional Statutory and Regulatory Bodies (PSRB), as well as demands from societal perspectives.
Affiliations:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
Canterbury Christ Church University, UK
Keywords:
Curriculum Agility
curriculum change
quality development
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 3
CDIO Standard 5
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 9
CDIO Standard 10
CDIO Standard 11
CDIO Standard 12
Year:
2024
Reference:
Allan, D. G., & Rowsell, G. D., 2017,. Developing the industry ready graduate. In Options Méditerranéennes. Series A: Mediterranean Seminars. CIHEAM-IAMZ, Zaragoza (Spain); UfM, Union for the Mediterranean; MTA-ATK, Centre for Agricultural Research-Hungarian Academy of Sciences; ICA, Association fo European Life Science Universities; GCHERA, Global Confederation of Higher Education Associations.:
Atkins, H and Bonfield, P., 2022, Tomorrow’s Engineering Research Challenges Visions from the UK Research Community, UK RI and Engineering Physical Research Council (EPSRC), [on-line at:] Tomorrow's Engineering Research Challenges (ukri.org):
Bennett, D., 2019. Graduate employability and higher education: Past, present and future. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 5, pp.31-61.:
Blumensaat, F., Leitão, J.P., Ort, C., Rieckermann, J., Scheidegger, A., Vanrolleghem, P.A. and Villez, K., 2019. How urban storm-and wastewater management prepares for emerging opportunities and threats: digital transformation, ubiquitous sensing, new data sources, and beyond-a horizon scan. Environmental science & technology, 53(15), pp.8488-8498.:
Brink, S.C., Carlsson, C.J., Enelund, M., Georgsson, F., Keller, E., Lyng, R., & McCartan, C. (2020). ‘Assessing Curriculum Agility in a CDIO Engineering Education’, in Proceedings of the 16th International CDIO Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden: Chalmers University of Technology, 2020, p. 13.:
Brink, S., Carlsson, C.J., Enelund, M., Georgsson, F., Keller, E., Lyng, R. and McCartan, C., 2021, October. Curriculum Agility: Responsive Organization, Dynamic Content, and Flexible Education. In 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.:
Cheah, S.M. and Yang, K., 2018. CDIO framework and skillsfuture: redesign of chemical engineering curriculum after 10 years of implementing CDIO. Proceedings of the 15th International CDIO Conference, Aarhuas Unvieristy, Aarhus, Denmark, June 24-28, 2019:
Engineering Council, (2019), The Accreditation of Higher Education Programs (AHEP) fourth edition [on-line at] https://www.engc.org.uk/media/3464/ahep-fourth-edition.pdf, pp 32-37:
EngineeringUK (2021) Half of new engineering recruits lack the right skills, Engineering UK [online at:] Half of new engineering recruits lack the right skills - EngineeringUK | Inspiring tomorrow's engineers.:
Fortin, C., Nortcliffe, A. and Serreau, Y., DEVELOPING GOOD PRACTICES FOR INDUSTRIAL ENGAGEMENT IN CO-CREATION OF CDIO CURRICULUM. Proceedings of the 15th International CDIO Conference, Aarhuas Unvieristy, Aarhus, Denmark, June 24-28, 2019:
Geschwind, L. and Broström, A., 2020. Technical universities: A historical perspective. Technical Universities: Past, present and future, pp.15-26.:
Guggemos, A. A., & Khattab, M. (2015, June). Beyond the industry advisory board: Increasing the role of industry engagement to support program quality. In 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 26-281).:
Hart, A., 1988. Knowledge acquisition for expert systems. In Knowledge, skill and artificial intelligence (pp. 103-111). Springer, London.:
Jones, J. W. (2014, June). More than advice: Increasing industry advisory board member involvement. In 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 24-914).:
Jørgensen, U., Lindegaard, H., & Brodersen, S. (2011). Foundations for a new type of design engineers–experiences from DTU meeting the CDIO concept. In Proceeding of the 7th International CDIO Conference, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, June 20 (Vol. 23, p. 2011).:
Kamaruzaman, M. F., Hamid, R., Mutalib, A. A., & Rasul, M. S. (2019). Comparison of Engineering Skills with IR 4.0 Skills. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (iJOE), 15(10), pp. 15–28. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v15i10.10879:
Kovacs, H., Capdevilla, I., Jermann, P., Lermigeaux-Sarrade, I. (2023). From university to work: Alumni viewpoints. In *2023 19th International CDIO Conference*, Trondheim, Norway, June 26-29, 2023.:
Kumar, M., Agarwal, S. and Shukla, M.(2013) A Hybrid Approach of Requirement Engineering in Agile Software Development. In 2013 International Conference on Machine Intelligence Research and Advancement. Pp 515-519. :
Latha, S., and P. Christopher B 2020. Vuca in engineering education: Enhancement of faculty competency for capacity building. Procedia Computer Science, 172, pp.741-747.:
Magnell, M., Söderlind, J. and Geschwind, L., 2016, June. Teaching-research nexus in engineering education. In Proceedings of the 12th international CDIO conference, Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland (pp. 12-16).:
Manna, S., Joyce, N., & Nortcliffe, A. (2023). Integration of graduate employability skills through industry outsourced CDIO project. *19th International CDIO Conference*, Trondheim, Norway, 26-29 June 2023.:
Mannan, R. (2021) Overcoming the shortage of Engineers, New Engineer, [on-line at:] Overcoming the Shortage of Engineers | NewEngineer:
McIntyre, C., & Fox, P. (2014, October). Developing a" High-Impact" Industry Advisory Board. In 2014 ASEE North Midwest Section Conference (Vol. 2014, No. 1). University of Iowa:
Neill, C. J., & Laplante, P. A. (2003). Requirements engineering: the state of the practice. IEEE software, 20(6), 40-45.:
Rhodes, C. (2018) Manufacturing: statistics and policy, Briefing Paper, House of Commons Library, [on-line at] https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN01942/SN01942.pdf:
Ormazabal, M., Serrano, N., Blanco, C., Carazo, F., Aldazábal, J., & Azasu, S. (2022). Aligning stakeholder needs with program requirements using a multi-stakeholder survey. In *18th International CDIO Conference* (pp. 610-621). Reykjavik University, Iceland.:
Refae, G. A. E., Askari, M. Y., & Alnaji, L. (2016). Does the industry advisory board enhance education quality?. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 12(1), 32-43.:
Rouvrais, S., Liem, I., Audunsson, H. and Proches, C.G., 2022, June. If you please, draw me a resilient curriculum!. In CDIO 2022: 18th CDIO International Conference, Reykjavik, Iceland:
Säisä, M., Määttä, S., Roslöf, J., & Chee, T. (2020). International cooperation between two project learning environments - A case study. *16th International CDIO Conference*, Chalmers UT, Sweden.:
Salmon, G. (2013) E-tivities: The Key to Active Online Learning. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.:
Schön, E. M., Thomaschewski, J., & Escalona, M. J. (2017). Agile Requirements Engineering: A systematic literature review. Computer standards & interfaces, 49, 79-91.:
Sparsø, J., Bolander, T., Fischer, P., Hansen, T. K., Høgh, S., Nyborg, M., & Todirica, E. (2011, June). CDIO projects in DTU’s B. Eng. in IT study program. In Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark.:
Tiewtoy, S., Krusong, W., & Kuptasthien, N. (2019). The collaboration between academia and industry for enhancing employability and faculty development. In *15th International CDIO Conference*, Aarhus University, Denmark.:
Törngren, M., & Herzog, E. (2016, October). Towards integration of CPS and systems engineering in education. In Proceedings of the 2016 Workshop on Embedded and Cyber-Physical Systems Education (p. 6). ACM.:
Wollschlager, N. and Guggenheim, É.F., 2004. A History of Vocational Education and Training in Europe--From Divergence to Convergence. European Journal: Vocational Training, 32, pp.1-3.:
Yang, K., Cheah, S.M. and Phua, S.T., Evaluation of Spiral Curriculum for Chemical Engineering using CDIO Framework. Proceedings of the 17th International CDIO Conference, hosted online by Chulalongkorn University & Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi, Bangkok, Thailand, June 21-23, 2021.:
on June 24, 2024 - 13:25 Anonymous (not verified)
Conceive
Design
Implement
Operate
