Mentoring Young Adults In The Development Of Social Responsibility

Mentoring Young Adults In The Development Of Social Responsibility

D. Brodeur (2012).  Mentoring Young Adults In The Development Of Social Responsibility. 19.

The mission, values, and objectives of engineering programs worldwide include statements about social responsibility and commitment to the development of a better society. For example,

• To instill in students a discriminating way of thinking so that they act in responsible ways to meet the needs and requirements of our changing contemporary world

• To foster tolerance and commitment to civic duties and human rights

• To contribute to the improvement of public policies, communities, companies, and social organizations

• To contribute to the development of the country and the region

• To foster the ability and passion to work wisely, creatively, and effectively for the betterment of humankind

Competencies and learning outcomes for graduates in most engineering programs address ethics, integrity, social responsibility, compassion, and living a life with purpose.

Such outcomes are aligned with the CDIO Syllabus v2.0, particularly in CDIO 2.5.2 Ethics, Integrity, and Social Responsibility and CDIO 2.5.3 Proactive Vision and Intention in Life. While many engineering programs state objectives and learning outcomes in these areas, few have developed effective teaching and learning strategies that systemically address them. For the most part, engineering programs are not adequately addressing ethics, integrity, and social responsibility.

The central thesis of this paper is that we believe that young adults in our engineering classrooms want to live lives that matter. Although some might disagree, we believe that young adults want to contribute to the betterment of society through the pursuit of their careers. Sometimes, cultural factors present challenges to their pursuits. A culture of individualism, for example in the United States, emphasizes freedom, independence, and competition, often at the expense of others. In other cultures, for example in much of the Global South, the emphasis is less on independence and more on solidarity, collaboration, and social responsibility. In this paper, we examine the meaning and foundations of social responsibility and address ways in which engineering programs can help students to develop social responsibility. We identify key issues related to social responsibility and suggest learning outcomes and methods to address them with a new generation of university students. We begin with a description of this generation of young adults.

 

Authors (New): 
Doris R. Brodeur
Pages: 
19
Affiliations: 
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
Keywords: 
Ethics
Social Responsibility
vision
cooperative learning
Service Learning
Year: 
2012
Reference: 
Nash, R. J. and Murray, M. C., Helping College Students Find Purpose: The Campus Guide to Meaning-Making, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California, 2010.: 
Robbins, A., Conquering Your Quarterlife Crisis: Advice from Twentysomethings Who Have Been There and Survived, Penguin, New York, 2004.: 
Parks, S. D., Big Questions, Worthy Dreams: Mentoring Young Adults in Their Search for Meaning, Purpose, and Faith. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California, 2000.: 
Astin, A. W., Astin, H. S., and Lindholm, J. A., Cultivating the Spirit: How College Can Enhance Students’ Inner Lives. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California, 2010.: 
Farmer, P., Pathologies of Power: Health, Human Rights, and the New War on the Poor. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, 2005.: 
O’Connell, M. H., Compassion: Loving Our Neighbor in an Age of Globalization. Orbis Books, Maryknoll, New York, 2009.: 
Held, V., The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global. Oxford University Press, New York, 2006.: 
Gutiérrez, G., A Theology of Liberation, Orbis Books, Maryknoll, New York, 1998.: 
Gutiérrez, G., The Power of the Poor in History, Orbis Books, Maryknoll, New York, 1998.: 
Neafsey, J., A Sacred Voice is Calling: Personal Vocation and Social Conscience, Orbis Books, Maryknoll, New York, 2006.: 
Lathem, S. A., Neumann, M.D., and Hayden, N., “The Socially Responsible Engineer: Assessing Student Attitudes of Roles and Responsibilities”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 100 No. 3, 2011, pp. 444-474.: 
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., and Masia, B. B., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook II -- Affective Domain, McKay, New York, 1964.: 
Chickering, A. W., Dalton, J. C., and Stamm, L., Encouraging Authenticity & Spirituality in Higher Education, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California, 2005.: 
Johnson, D. W., and Johnson, R. T., “Cooperative Learning: Relationships Among Theory, Research and Practice,” in Cooper, J. L., and Robinson, P. eds., Small Group Learning in Higher Education: Research and Practice, New Forums Press, Stillwater, Oklahoma, 2011, pp. 10-18.: 
Johnson, D. W., and Johnson, R. T., “Constructive Controversy: Energizing Learning” in Cooper, J. L., and Robinson, P. eds., Small Group Learning in Higher Education: Research and Practice, New Forums Press, Stillwater, Oklahoma, 2011, pp. 114-121.: 
Baillie, C., “Waste for Life: Socially Just Materials Research,” in Baillie, C., Pawley, A. L., and Riley, D., eds., Engineering and Social Justice: In the University and Beyond, Purdue University Press, West Lafayette, IN, 2012, pp. 87-106.: 
Cardella, M. E., Zoltowski, C. B., and Oakes, W. C., “Developing Human-Centered Design Practices and Perspectives Through Service-Learning,” in Baillie, C., Pawley, A. L., and Riley, D., eds., Engineering and Social Justice: In the University and Beyond, Purdue University Press, West Lafayette, IN, 2012, pp. 11-29.: 
Go to top
randomness