INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES OF SEVEN FINNISH B.SC. IN IT PROGRAMS

INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES OF SEVEN FINNISH B.SC. IN IT PROGRAMS

J. Roslöf (2021).  INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES OF SEVEN FINNISH B.SC. IN IT PROGRAMS. 12.

Defining the intended learning outcomes is a significant part of curriculum design. Especially, the program-level competence requirements outline the objectives of the education, align the more detailed program structures and content of the curriculum, and create the basis for constructive alignment. Several different bodies aim at defining the goals of engineering programs on different levels of abstraction. Some of these documents can be considered as statements of the 'minimum threshold'. Respectively, others provide detailed guidelines to support the design of post-secondary programs in specific engineering fields. For example, the CDIO Initiative has defined a general reference syllabus aiming at creating a taxonomy of engineering learning rationalized against the norms of contemporary engineering practice. While designing new engineering programs, it is interesting to study how different universities have documented the intended learning outcomes of their programs in related domains. In this paper, the program-level learning objectives of seven Finnish B.Sc. in Information Technology programs are discussed and reflected with the CDIO Syllabus based on the information available on the public curriculum descriptions.

Authors (New): 
Janne Roslöf
Pages: 
12
Affiliations: 
University of Jyväskylä
Keywords: 
Curriculum Design
Competence Requirements
Information Technology
CDIO Standard 1
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 11
Year: 
2021
Reference: 
Aalto University (2020a). Curriculum 2020-2022; Bachelor’s Degree Program in Electrical Engineering [Finnish: Sähkötekniikan kandidaattiohjelma]. Available online at https://into.aalto.fi/display/fikandelec/Opetussuunnitelma+2020-2022: 
Aalto University (2020b). Curriculum 2020-2022; Bachelor’s Degree Program in Electrical Engineering, Information Technology Major [Finnish: Informaatioteknologian pääaine]. Available online at https://into.aalto.fi/display/fikandelec/Informaatioteknologia+2020-2022: 
ABET (2019). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. Baltimore, MD, USA.: 
ACM (2005). Computing Curricula 2005 - The Overview Report. USA.: 
ACM (2014). Software Engineering 2014 - Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Software Engineering. USA.: 
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32, pp. 347-364.: 
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. The Society for Research into Higher Education, 4th Edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.: 
Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H.; & Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives - The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. David McKay Company, New York, USA.: 
CDIO (2020). CDIO standards 3.0. Available online at http://cdio.org/content/cdio-standards-30 (acquired Dec 29, 2020).: 
Crawley, E.F., Malmqvist, J., Lucas, W.A., & Brodeur, D.R. (2011). The CDIO Syllabus v2.0 - An Updated Statement of Goals for Engineering Education. Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.: 
Crawley, E.F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D.R., & Edström, k. (2014). Rethinking Engineering Education – The CDIO Approach. 2nd Edition, Springer, Switzerland.: 
ENAEE (2015). EUR-ACE® Framework Standards and Guidelines. Edition 31st March 2015: 
Gonzáles, J., & Wagenaar, R. (Eds) (2008). Tuning Educational Structures in Europe. Universities’ contribution to the Bologna Process – An introduction. 2nd Edition, Universidad de Deusto.: 
LUT University (2020). Study Guide 2020-2021; Information Technology (Specialization in Software Engineering) [Finnish: Tietotekniikka]. Available online at https://forms.lut.fi/opinto- Proceedings of the 17th International CDIO Conference, hosted online by Chulalongkorn University & Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi, Bangkok, Thailand, June 21-23, 2021. opas/tutkinto.aspx?id=otm-45748d3c-22e1-4889-b005-25d83eb1f331&period=lut-curriculum-period-2020-2021: 
Tam, M. (2014). Outcomes-based approach to quality assessment and curriculum improvement in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 22/2, pp. 158-168.: 
Tampere University (2020). Student’s Guide 2020-2021; Computing and Electrical Engineering [Finnish: Tieto- ja sähkötekniikan kandidaattiohjelma]. Available online: https://www.tuni.fi/opiskelijanopas/opintotiedot/tutkinto-ohjelmat/otm-fa02a1e7-4fe1-43e3-818b-810d8e723531?year=2020: 
University of Jyväskylä (2021). Study Guide 2020-2023; Information and Software Engineering. Available online at https://opinto-opas.jyu.fi/2021/fi/tutkintoohjelma/tekka2021/: 
University of Oulu (2020). Study Guide 2020-2021; Computer Science and Engineering. Available online: https://opas.peppi.oulu.fi/fi/perustutkintokoulutus/tieto-ja-sahkotekniikan-tiedekunta/11738/10965: 
University of Turku (2020). Study Guide 2020-2022; Information and Communication Technology. Available onine: https://opas.peppi.utu.fi/fi/ohjelma/15942?period=2020-2022: 
Åbo Akademi University (2020). Study Guide 2020-2022; Computer Engineering [Swedish: Datateknik]. Available online: https://studiehandboken.abo.fi/sv/program/17004?period=2020-2022: 
Go to top