GENDER DIFFERENCES IN ATTITUTES TOWARDS ENGINEERING STUDIES AND IN GRADUATES

GENDER DIFFERENCES IN ATTITUTES TOWARDS ENGINEERING STUDIES AND IN GRADUATES

Gender difference in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) education is well reported and analysed, and models and recommendations have been put forward. Research has revealed that different engineering programs are more attractive to one gender than the other and understanding university students’ attitudes towards STEM is essential for changing this situation. Choice of studies can be difficult because so many factors are involved, e.g. peer pressure, stereotypes, access and availability and local cultural expectations. This paper seeks to ascertain if there is a gender difference in engineering students’ attitudes toward engineering, and if the development of gender balance has been changing during the last decade in the different engineering fields. Survey data was collected from students enrolled in a university engineering program at Reykjavik University, Iceland, and available data on the number of graduates between 2008 and 2021 were analysed. The results show that the genders may have divergent interest in different disciplines of engineering which is reflected in quite different gender ratios at graduation, but at the same time there is a systematic change during the last decade in some engineering disciplines. Furthermore, females are getting interested in engineering education significantly later than males, but the genders report similar reasons for choosing engineering education. This topic touches on CDIO Standard 1 (program philosophy), 7 and 8 (new methods of teaching and learning).

Authors (New): 
Ásrún Matthíasdóttir
Haraldur Audunsson
Pages: 
918-928
Affiliations: 
Reykjavik University, Iceland
Keywords: 
STEM
gender differences
Engineering
CDIO Standard 1
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
Year: 
2022
Reference: 
ASEE (American Society for Engineering Education. (2021). Profiles of engineering and engineering technology. Washington, DC. https://ira.asee.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Total-by-the-Number- 2020.pdf.: 
Balakrishnan, B. (2014). Female engineering students’ perception on engineering programme and profession: a case study in Malaysia and Japan. In 8th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (Valencia, Spain. 10-12, March) IATED.: 
Brown, K. V. (2014). Tech shift: More women in computer science classes. San Francisco Chronicle https://www.sfgate.com/education/article/Tech-shift-More-women-in-computer-science-classes- 5243026.php.: 
Cheryan, S., Zieger, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), pp. 1–35.: 
https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000052
Cruz, J. & Kellam, N. (2018). Beginning an engineer's journey: A narrative examination of how, when, and why students choose the engineering major. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(4). Pp. 556- 582.: 
Farrell, E. F. (2002). Engineering a warmer welcome for female students. Chronicle of Higher Education, 48(24), pp A31-A32.: 
Fry, R., Kennedy, B. & Funk, C. (2021). STEM jobs see uneven progress in increasing gender, racial and ethnic diversity. Pew Research Center, www.pewresearch.org: 
Funke, A., Berges, M., & Hubwieser, P. (2016). Different perceptions of computer science. Pp. 14–18. IEEE.: 
https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2016.1
González-González, C.S., García-Holgado, A., de los Angeles Martinez-Estévez, M., Gil, M., Martín- Fernandez, A., Marcos, A., Aranda, C., & Gershon, T. S. (2018). Gender and engineering: Developing actions to encourage women in tech. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) 2018, pp. 2082-2087,: 
10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363496
Huang. X., Zhang, J. & Hudson, L. (2019). Impact of math self -efficacy, math anxiety, and growth mindset on math and science career interest for middle school students: the gender moderating effect. European Journal of Psychology of Education. 34:621-640,: 
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0403-z
Jacobs, J. E. (2005). Twenty-five years of research on gender and ethnic differences in math and science career choices: What have we learned? New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development.: 
Lefever, S., Dal, M. & Matthíasdóttir, Á. (2006). Online data collection in academic research: advantages and limitations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), pp. 574-582.: 
doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 8535.2006.00638.x
Lichtenstein, G., Chen, H., Smith, K., & Maldonado, T. (2014). Retention and persistence of women and minorities along the engineering pathway in the United States. In A. Johri & B. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, pp. 311–334. Cambridge University Press: 
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013451.021
Lin, B., Ghaddar, B. & Hurst, A. (2021). Text mining undergraduate engineering programs’ applications: the role of gender, nationality, and socio-economic status. arXiv:2107.14034v3 [cs.CY] 21.: 
Matthiasdottir, A. (2018). Gender differences in engineering students´ choice of studies. Proceedings at 14th International CDIO Conference, Kanazawa Institute of Technology, Kanazawa in Japan.: 
Matthiasdottir, A., & Palsdottir, J. (2016). Where are the girls in STEM? Presented at the 6th STS Italia Conference | Sociotechnical Environments, Trento, Italy.: 
Paino, M., & Renzulli, L. A. (2013). Digital Dimension of Cultural Capital: The (In)Visible Advantages for Students Who Exhibit Computer Skills. Sociology of Education, 86(2), pp. 124–138.: 
https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040712456556
Peixoto, A., González-González, C. S., Strachan, R., Plaza, P., de los Angeles Martinez-Estévez, M., Blaz & Castro, M. (2018). Diversity and inclusion in engineering education: Looking through the gender question, 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 2071-2075,: 
10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363494
Previo, D. (2017). Plan de Igualdad de Oportunidades entre Mujeres y Hombres de la UVa 2016-2020. Universidad de Valladolid.: 
Robinson, G. & McIlwee, J. (1991). Men, women, and the culture of engineering. Sociological Quarterly, 32(3), pp. 403-421.: 
Salas-Morera, L., Ruiz-Bustos, R., Cejas-Molina, M.A., Olivares-Olmedilla, J.L., García-Hernández, L. & M. Palomo-Romero, J. M. (2021). Understanding why women don’t choose engineering degrees. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31, pp. 325–338.: 
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09550-4
Sweeney, J. (2020). The role of sub-discipline choice in women’s enrolment and success within Canadian undergraduate engineering programs. Proceedings 2020 Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA-ACEG20) Conference.: 
10.24908/pceea.vi0.14203
SWE (2021). SWE Research Fast Facts. Retrieved January 2021 from https://swe.org/wpcontent/ uploads/2021/10/SWE-Fast-Facts_Oct-2021.pdf: 
Go to top