In the current CDIO V2.1 standard (2016), there is no formal definition of what design is or
what process should be employed. Instead, it is left to the educator to figure out what is the
right way to proceed. Among philosophers of design, there is no agreement on the nature
of design processes. Design is often taught as an iterative method taking a developed list
of requirements and trying different combinations of elements until a satisfactory solution is
found. Knowing which elements are worth investigating is often said to be only gained through
reading background material and experience. There are alternatives in the form of formalized
design methods, including Axiomatic Design and Google’s Design Sprint. This paper presents
an overview of these methods to provide opportunities in hybrid design frameworks for the CDIO
educator. When properly informed, both students and teachers can choose or create the right
D in CDIO to fit the project or discipline.
Pages:
9
Affiliations:
Reykjavik University, Iceland
Keywords:
Design
Axiomatic Design
Sprint
requirements
CDIO Standard 5
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
Year:
2021
Reference:
Asimow, M. (1962). Introduction to design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall.:
Beck, K., Beedle, M., van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., … Thomas, D. (2001). Manifesto for agile software development. Web page. Retrieved from https://agilemanifesto.org/:
Brooks, J., Frederick P. (2010). The design of design: Essays from a computer scientist. AddisonWesley.:
Cochran, D. S., Foley, J. T., & Bi, Z. (2016). Use of the Manufacturing System Design Decomposition for Comparative Analysis and Effective Design of Production Systems. International Journal of Production Research, 55, 870–890.:
Cochran, D. S., Smith, J., Sereno, R., Aldrich, W., & Highly, A. (2019). How to develop and sustain a lean organization through the use of collective system design. In H. B. Nembhard, E. A. Cudney, & K. M. Coperich (Eds.), Emerging frontiers in industrial and systems engineering: Success through collaboration (pp. 129–148). CRC Press.:
Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D. B., & Edström, K. (2014). Rethinking engineering education: The CDIO approach (2nd ed.). Springer.:
10.1007/978331905561-9
Eilenberg, S., & Mac Lane, S. (1945, September). General theory of natural equivalences. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 58(2), 231–294.:
10.2307/1990284
Hatchuel, A., & Weil, B. (2003, August 19–21). A new approach of innovative design: An introduction to ck theory. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design ICED ’03.:
INCOSE. (2015). Systems engineering handbook: A guide for system life cycle processes and activities, version 4.0. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.:
Kant, I. (1781). Critik der reinen Vernunft. Riga: Johann Friedrich Hartknoch.:
Knapp, J., Zeratsky, J., & Kowitz, B. (2016). Sprint: How to solve big problems and test new ideas in just five days. New York: Simon & Schuster.:
Kujawa, K., Weber, J., Puik, E., & Paetzold, K. (2018). Exploring and Adapt! – Extending the Adapt! Method to Develop Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems. In E. Puik, J. T. Foley, D. Cochran, & M. Betasolo (Eds.), 12th International Conference on Axiomatic Design (ICAD) (Vol. 223, p. 01006). Reykjavík, Iceland: MATEC Web of Conferences. Retrieved 20190425,:
10.1051/matecconf/201822301006
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Prentice Hall.:
Paul, R., & Behjat, L. (2016). Using principles of SCRUM project management in an integrated design project. In (pp. 716–729).:
Royce, W. W. (1970, August). Managing the development of large software systems. In Proceedings IEEE WESCON (pp. 328–338).:
Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.:
Suh, N. P. (2001). Axiomatic Design Advances and Applications. Oxford University Press.:
Suh, N. P., Cochran, D. S., & Lima, P. C. (1998). Manufacturing System Design. In 48th General Assembly of College International Pour La Recherche en Productique (CIRP), Annals of the CIRP (Vol. 47, pp. 627–639).:
Tanarro, E. C., MunozGuijosa, J. M., Lantada, A. D., Wiña, P. L., Otero, J. E., Sanz, J. L. M., … Mondéjar, S. G. (2015, June). Teaching engineering design to a multidisciplinary audience at master’s level: Benefits and challenges of the cdio approach. In J. Björkqvist et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th international cdio conference. Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China: CDIO Initiative.:
Ulrich, K., Eppinger, S., & Yang, M. C. (2019). Product design and development (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGrawHill Education.:
Weber, J., Förster, D., Kößler, J., & Paetzold, K. (2015). Design of changeable production units within the automotive sector with axiomatic design. In M. K. Thompson, A. Giorgetti, P. Citti, D. Matt, & N. P. Suh (Eds.), 9th International Conference on Axiomatic Design (ICAD) (Vol. 34, pp. 93–97). Florence, Italy: Elsevier ScienceDirect. (Sep. 16–18):
10.1016/ j.procir.2015.07.061
Weber, J., Förster, D., Stäbler, M., & Paetzold, K. (2017). Adapt! — agile project management supported by axiomatic design. In O. Dodoun (Ed.), 11th International Conference on Axiomatic Design (ICAD) (p. 01018). Iasi, Romania: MATEC Web of Conferences. (Sep. 15–18):
on February 10, 2022 - 09:57 Maria Siiskonen
Conceive
Design
Implement
Operate
