BLENDED LABORATORIES FOR JOINING TECHNOLOGY

BLENDED LABORATORIES FOR JOINING TECHNOLOGY

S. Sheikhi, K. Bronstein, E. Mayer, R. Langer, A. Reise, C. Stöhr (2023).  BLENDED LABORATORIES FOR JOINING TECHNOLOGY. 166-178.

Laboratory training is an essential part of most Engineering Education programs and amplified by the Covid-19 crisis, educational institutions are increasingly exploring blended and online laboratories as an alternative or complement to pure on-side learning environments. In this paper, we report on the (re-) design, implementation and evaluation of a blended laboratory concept in joining technology. The laboratory consists of three interlinked pillars and builds conceptually on the flipped classroom approach. We evaluate student learning and satisfaction as well as teacher experiences in the new learning design based on student evaluations and performance data as well as teacher reflections. The results show that the new laboratory improved the average grade of students by 12% compared to the traditional set-up, which we attribute to the increase in active learning. Students also report high satisfaction with the new format and appreciate the flexibility and accessibility of the online learning materials. Qualitative analysis indicates, however, that successful participation in the flipped format is coupled to high degree of self-regulated learning skills. Further, teachers partly had difficulties to ensure active participation in the synchronous online sessions. Despite these issues, we conclude that the presented flipped laboratory concept is an excellent format to combine the advantages of online learning with the hands-on experience of physical laboratory work. By utilizing the benefits of online learning, this format reduces the time students spend passively listening to lectures and more than doubles the time spent on active learning and practice.

Authors (New): 
Shahram Sheikhi
Konstantin Bronstein
Eduard Mayer
Robert Langer
Azadeh Reise
Christian Stöhr
Pages: 
166-178
Affiliations: 
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany
Kopling Schulen, Stuttgart, Germany
Keywords: 
Online laboratories
Flipped Classroom
Online learning
Blended Learning
Robotic Welding
CDIO Standard 5
CDIO Standard 6
CDIO Standard 8
Year: 
2023
Reference: 
Bartocci, E., Singh, R., von Stein, F. B., Amedome, A., Caceres, A. J. J., Castillo, J., Closser, E., Deards, G., Goltsev, A., Ines, R. Sta., Isbilir, C., Marc, J. K., Moore, D., Pardi, D., Sadhu, S., Sanchez, S., Sharma, P., Singh, A., Rogers, J., … Fenton, F. H. (2011). Teaching cardiac electrophysiology modeling to undergraduate students: Laboratory exercises and GPU programming for the study of arrhythmias and spiral wave dynamics. Advances in Physiology Education, 35(4), 427–437. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00034.2011: 
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Vol. 2. Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological. American Psychological Association, 67-71. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004: 
Burdinski, D. & Schifftler-Weinle, H. A. (2020). Laborpraktika in Chemie und Pharma im Corona-Semester. Die Neue Hochschule, 6, 38-41.: 
Chen, X., Song, G., & Zhang, Y. (2010). Virtual and Remote Laboratory Development: A review. In Earth and Space 2010: Engineering, Science, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments, 3843–3852.: 
Cleff, T. (2019). Applied Statistics and Multivariate Data Analysis for Business and Economics: A Modern Approach Using SPSS, Stata, and Excel. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.: 
Correia, S., Teixeira, J., & Silva, A. (2018). Virtual laboratories: A review of research on the use of virtual laboratories in science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(3), 327-336.: 
Graham, R. (2018). The Global State of the Art in Engineering Education. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT): Cambridge, MA, USA. Retrieved from: https://www.rhgraham.org/resources/Phase-1-engineering-education-benchmarking-study-2017.pdf: 
Graham, R. (2022). Crisis and catalyst: The impact of COVID-19 on global practice in engineering education. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT): Cambridge, MA, USA.: 
Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale Conference, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556325.2566239: 
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-first Century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106: 
Krämer, O. & Hammerich, H. (2020). Auswertung der Dozierendenbefragung zur Distanzlehre an Musikhochschulen in der Corona-Krise. Rostock: hmt Rostock.: 
Lewis, D. I. (2014). The pedagogical benefits and pitfalls of virtual tools for teaching and learning laboratory practices in the biological sciences. The Higher Education Academy: STEM, 1–30.: 
Lynch, T., & Ghergulescu, I. (2017). Review of Virtual Labs as the Emerging Technologies for Teaching STEM subjects. INTED2017 Proc. 11th Int. Technol. Educ. Dev. Conf. 6-8 March Valencia Spain, 6082–6091: 
Merriam, S. B. 1998. Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.: 
Mohammed, A. K., El Zoghby, H. M. & Elmesalawy, M. M., 2020. Remote Controlled Laboratory Experiments for Engineering Education in the Post-COVID-19 Era: Concept and Example , s.l.: IEEE.: 
Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (Vol. 1, pp. 22–38). Routledge.: 
Nedic, Z., Machotka, J., & Nafalski, A. (2003). Remote Laboratories versus Virtual and Real Laboratories. 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003., 1, T3E-T3E. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2003.1263343: 
Olesen, V., Stöhr, C., Enelund, M., & Malmqvist, J. (2022). Learning Mechatronics Using Digital Live Labs. Proceedings of the 18th International CDIO Conference, 831–847.: 
Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrović, V. M., & Jovanović, K. (2016). Virtual Laboratories for Education in Science, Technology, and Engineering: A Review. Computers & Education, 95, 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002: 
Post, L. S., Guo, P., Saab, N., & Admiraal, W. (2019). Effects of Remote Labs on Cognitive, Behavioral, and Affective Learning Outcomes in Higher Education. Computers & Education, 140, 103596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103596: 
Rios, M. A., González-González, J., Gómez-Pulido, J. A., & Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2017). A systematic review of the impact of virtual laboratories on students' learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(4), 362-379.: 
Stöhr, C., & Adawi, T. (2018). Flipped Classroom Research: From “Black Box” to “White Box” Evaluation. Education Sciences, 8(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8010022: 
Stöhr, C., Demazière, C., & Adawi, T. (2020). The polarizing effect of the online flipped classroom. Computers & Education, 147, 103789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103789: 
West, J., & Veenstra, A. (2012). Cane Toad or Computer Mouse? Real and Computer-Simulated Laboratory Exercises in Physiology Classes. Australian Journal of Education, 56(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494411205600105: 
Yin, R. K. 1984. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.: 
Go to top